PostingWhy not to have children

scan0002_Small.jpg Interesting piece in The Times yesterday about a new bestseller by French author Corinne Maier called No Kid: 40 Reasons Not to Have Children. I say 'interesting' advisedly, if only because the story made me wonder how Maier's managing chez elle, where I imagine her two teenage children have presumably had something to say to their mum about breaking this social taboo. I don't know anyone who's dared to admit they don't want kids, so I quite admire Maier for tackling this thorny subject.

Despite its provocative title and tongue-in-cheek content, No Kid actually makes some sensible arguments, with Maier suggesting, for example, that it's a mistake to pity people who do not have children, when many of them have chosen a positive and sensible alternative to becoming parents. Better to label them child-free, rather than childless, she argues. Perhaps it's an issue of semantics, but I couldn't argue with the underlying sentiment.

The book apparently emerged from Maier's concern that no one is doing anything to temper an idealised view of motherhood fostered by two potent forces in her native France: the state, which wants more babies to help pay pensions, and the baby industry. Belonging to a generation of women who despair at their own inadequacy if their babies don't possess the most desirable audio-visual stimulatory toys of the moment, ('stimulation' being one of the current baby industry buzz words) I know what she means.

The book certainly does its best to counter any idealistic views, listing all the things parents have to give up when they have kids:

1. A full night's sleep,

2. A lie-in

3. Deciding to go to the cinema on the spur of the moment

4. Staying out later than midnight (babysitters have to be relieved)

5. Visiting a museum or exhibition (children start playing up).

Then there's the colossal strain on parental relationships to take into account, when having sex has to be dutifully squeezed into those tiny windows when neither partner is too exhausted even to contemplate it, when differences of opinion on the best way to warm a bottle of milk (before adding powder or after?) assume monumental proportions it would take a peace camp to resolve.

This sounds like a clever, sophisticated book; it's already climbed to the top of France's best-seller lists, and its publishers, Michalon, must be hoping it will do the same here in the UK, but even so, I still can't agree with its basic premise. Having a baby is fab. 

Posted 21 August 2007 14:28

Parenting gurus Books Childcare Dilemmas Domestic chaos Etiquette Guilt Paradoxes

Comments

Flowerpot said:

I was listening to the radio in the car and they had a phone in about this very topic - of course provoking wide discussion! Wonder what her children thought of her comments?

Posted 21 August 2007 16:05

Mother at Large said:

Goodness knows, Flowerpot!! She must have had some explaining to do. But I do agree with her idea it's a valid choice not to have children, even though personally it's not what I chose.

Posted 21 August 2007 18:55

DJ Kirkby said:

*jealous* what an excellent idea for a book! Wish I'd thought of it. I know MANY people who swear that if they had their time back they would only ever have had one child and I also know a few who have chosen not to have children.

Posted 22 August 2007 06:33

Abel said:

I guess it boils down to personal choice when it comes to having children. As long as you're happy...



But then again, we will know what the author is up to. Maybe some hidden agenda.

Posted 22 August 2007 09:42

Abel said:

sorry, we will NEVER know what...

Posted 22 August 2007 09:43

Mother at Large said:

DJ, some people won't even admit it was a seismic life-changing event to have a baby, much less say they want to stick at one. It seems taboo these days to express anything less than absolute enthusiasm for having hordes of children.



Abel, funny how the personal becomes the political so often though, as I think this book is rightly saying. Choices we think we make as individuals about whether to have kids, or if so how many, are so often influenced by wider political forces such as employment rights, tax, sex discrimination etc.

Posted 22 August 2007 12:24

Rob Clack said:

Well, we chose not to have kids and have never regretted it.



In our late 30's, which was probably just about our last chance, we went on a 7-week expedition to north-east Greenland collecting fossils. That was a pivotal moment in my wife's career and gave her the boost that ultimately resulted in a professorship. And we've both been able to work away from home in a way that would simply have been out of the question if we'd had children.



Fortunately, I don't recall ever meeting anyone who let us think they felt sorry for us because we had no children. We certainly don't feel sorry for ourselves. Quite the reverse.

Posted 22 August 2007 13:28

Mother at Large said:

Rob Clack, I would love to go on an expedition to Greenland, or similar, and have fond memories of fossil-collecting on the coastline here in Scotland.

Posted 22 August 2007 13:37

Joyfulgirl said:

One thing I have still not figured is what exactly did I spend all my time on before I had a baby?! ... surely I should have achieved so much more with all that free time - perhaps I didn't because of all the sleep-ins and visits to the cinema!

Posted 22 August 2007 20:36

Mother at Large said:

Joyfulgirl, it's a mystery to me too. I blame maternal amnesia.

Posted 22 August 2007 22:02


Post a comment

Enter your comment here.

You can use some html tags such as <b> and <i>.

Word verification

Name

Email (will not be made public)

Website (optional)

Remember me